Being present…

Expanding on my last post…

Letting go is the first step to expanding your performance skill set. What you are ultimately shooting for is the ability to “be present”.

What the heck does that mean? That means truly listening and responding to your audience in a deep, meaningful way. That means knowing your stuff so well that you can focus on experiencing the moment with your audience rather performing to your audience.

This is not easy, and is particularly difficult when you are starting out; even more so when you’ve been performing full-time for a while.

Why? Let’s tackle the first scenario. When you are breaking in new material, you are present in the moment (at times terrifyingly so), but your attention is focused on the “whats” and “hows”. The emphasis is on the mechanics. Think about when you first learned how to ride a bike. If you are like me, you probably spent all your time thinking about the little details about pedaling, steering, pushing off, balancing, conquering your fears, etc. As you master the smaller skills that build up to actually riding, the details are overwhelming and actually make it harder to ride the bicycle. You try and try again until finally you find yourself coasting down the street. For a moment, you forget all the details and realize, “Hey, I’m actually riding the bike!” The excitement and adrenaline take over and for a few seconds you are actually in the moment of “riding the bike”. That is, until the enormity of what you are doing kicks in and you start focusing not on riding, but on controlling. This is typically the moment when we come crashing to the ground. Over time we learn to let the details go and focus on the bigger picture, which is when it becomes pure pleasure and you can savor the experience.

Once you’ve “mastered” (how I hate that term) the small stuff, you then spend months, years or more enjoying and refining the experience. If you are lucky enough to experience this joy and get paid for it you are a fortunate soul indeed.

Until… it becomes a job, a chore, a task. Just one more thing you need to do in between other things.

This is the most dangerous time, as now your focus can drift from the experience you are in to other concerns: the commute, financial or relationship issues, small annoyances (perhaps how tight your shoes are), where you are going to eat after the show, and other unrelated details. You are at that place where you are just doing another _____________ (fill in the blank: job, task, show, performance, favor, etc.).

Once you begin to drift, you are no longer present, and others can sense it. It has a negative impact on other people’s engagement and can have calamitous effect on the quality of your work.

Sure, you are still providing the same service, but the quality of it has taken a hit.

There are tools that actors and other performers use to remain in the moment, but the most significant are awareness of the issue and a commitment to being present. If you are not present, there is no way you can truly “let go” (at least not in a way that will benefit your work).

Posted in Performance | Leave a comment

Letting Go…

I performed last evening for a group of supporters (“Friends”) of a local library last evening. The show was open to the public in a small town of 1,200 people. While two-thirds of the audience were from the town, the other third had traveled up to forty miles round trip to experience the show.

While the expected audience was a mix blend of family audiences (read: adults and children), the reality was a crowd that was predominately comprised of retired (or near-retired) folks and four children under the age of five.

I always travel prepared to perform for different audiences, and most of my material can be performed for any audience with minor adjustments in presentation, style and approach, so I am usually not concerned with demographics.

However…

This performance had been billed as my family show and I believe in delivering what you’ve been asked to bring.

This left me with a bit of a conundrum: do I switch gears and perform the hard-hitting stuff for the mostly adult audience or do I push on and satisfy the young with the visual magic and, at times, sillier physical comedy?

In the end I elected to do both. I decided to “cast my fate to the wind” and just rely on instinct.

As I performed each piece, I threw myself into the experience completely and utterly and let the reactions determine the next piece and style. I don’t honestly remember much of what I said or did and how the pieces varied from my normal, polished presentations, but the reaction of the audience was remarkable. Afterwards, a majority of people felt a need to come up to me and interact with me. This led to several brief discussions on potential, joy, and love (to mention a few topics that came up).

—————

When I was in college studying music and theatre, I was cast in an original play for four actors. The opening of the play featured approximately 35-40 minutes of dialogue between two of the characters – a young couple – and their interactions while they awaited the arrival of the other couple. This was accompanied by much “beer” drinking, snacking, and exposition. We performed the show thirteen times in fourteen days and, for the most part, I spent my time doing my job: acting as a character in a show.

Except for one performance.

About two-thirds of the way through the run, I remember standing in the wings and watching the preshow lights go dark so that I could enter for the start of the show. The next thing I remember was walking off into the wings.

Immediately one of the other actors walked up to me with excitement in her eyes and said, “Where were you?” I replied that I had no idea what they were talking about and asked what they meant. “You were gone! I mean, your character existed, you were speaking the lines, moving around the stage all like you normally do, but you, the actor, were gone! You were just [the character]!”

Now, I’m not a mystically-minded person, but an experience like that doesn’t come along very often. As a stage actor, you are speaking someone else’s lines, moving where someone else told you to go, wearing someone else’s clothing and you know everything about the story arc of your character. Yet it is only you who breathes life into the character. While you can control every physical mannerism and adopt alternate speech patterns, it is not until you inhabit the character, truly let go and become them that audiences believe you as that character.

How does that apply to magic? Every show I am saying basically the same words, moving the same way and making the same choreographed actions to “effect” the magic in the show. The benefit of doing your own show is that you get to perform the same pieces literally thousands and tens of thousands of times throughout the span of your career. The curse of doing your own show is that you get to perform the same pieces literally thousands and tens of thousands of times throughout the span of your career.

The challenge is to avoid getting bored by your presentations, your movements, the very words you speak. It is too easy to fall into the trap of “phoning in your performance”. Audiences can sense when you are not present and they will respond appropriately. They are also keenly aware when a piece is so polished that it feels canned.

Unfortunately an unavoidable byproduct of performing frequently. Being aware of its potential impact, we can move to counteract the effect.

How do we do this? By letting go…

Once you have rehearsed all the technical and polished the presentational aspects of your work, you hone it further through performance. At some point you work might feel the piece is “finished” and the temptation is to repeat the piece in toto. The work is complete, so it become a component in the show that fills three or five minutes and you can rely on it to produce a response from the audience.

Until it no longer does.

A lot of performers will discard the piece without asking why it is no longer getting the response they are used to. The reason these pieces no longer get the response is because they no longer connect with the audience. It is easy to blame the piece, but the fact is that the performer is no longer connecting with the audience. Just when the piece is reaching the next level, it is discarded. This is a true shame as it is now on the cusp and ready to be truly mined for full effect.

At this point, all the muscle memory is established, all the presentational features are there, but what is missing is the release of all control by the performer. Now is the time to focus, but not on the words or actions, but on the audience.

It is the perfect time to let go of all control of the piece and commit to playing (pleasuring) the audience. Your body and mind know what to do, now you let go of your expectations and experience the piece through the audience. Allow yourself to see and process the individual reactions in the audience. Connect with them through eye contact and allow the material to breathe as you explore pacing, opportunities to share moments with the audience and take risks by free-associating and responding to every chuckle, smile, frown or laugh.

You have worked very hard to get to this point, now is the time to let go and enjoy it for yourself and, in doing so, share the joy and increase the pleasure of your experience. Reactions are more immediate and amplified and you create a true shared experience.

Trust me, audiences will respond, and so will you.

 

Posted in Performance | Leave a comment

Grace under Pressure

“Everything in the labor of Art amounts to one thing: the difficult should become customary, the customary easy and the easy—beautiful.”—Constantin Stanislavski

Here is an excellent representation of that ideal…

And another televised performance:

Posted in Performance, Theory | Leave a comment

Buying Magic

When I performed strolling in restaurants, I would occasionally borrow a dollar, transform it into a hundred, transform it back and return the one to the volunteer.

Why did I do this? Because if I didn’t, it seriously cut into my bottom line.

Occasionally I would give the hundred away (for important clients and in situations where the impact was worth the investment), but I started thinking about how to justify the change and keeping the hundred dollar bill in theatrical context.

A psychological tactic that I believe could be very effective (and to some degree logical) is to “purchase” the dollar bill from the spectator with either a paper dollar, an Ike coin, Susan B. or golden dollar. The premise is that you would like to show them something with a dollar bill, but it only works with bills that you have never touched before (or haven’t owned for any longer than three minutes). You then perform the transformation and then keep the $100… It can be even more effective, psychologically-speaking, if you then pull out your wallet and slide the newly-transformed $100 in with dozens more just like it (although this could hurt potential tipping, if this is a concern for you)…

A dodge for avoiding spectator requests to keep the bill might be something of the following:

I’d love to give it to you, but if I ever gave them away, I’d lose the ability to make more. I’ll just stuff ’em in my mattress when I get home.

Posted in Performance, Theory | Leave a comment

Truth and Responsibility

All too often we deceive ourselves more than our audiences. We think that if we go through the steps involved to make the trick work that our audience will be as entranced as we. It is easy to lose sight of how the “clothes fit the man.”

Truth? In magic? Isn’t the point of magic to deceive the audience’s eyes and minds under the guise of entertainment? The answer of course is yes and no.

When I speak of truth, I speak not only of the facts perceived by the audience by way of the literal presentation, but also of the subtle details that form the foundation of the total experience. The buttress of your show; so to speak. This starts with intentions. Why are you there? Why do you do this? What do you want to communicate? Do you have anything worth saying?

Audiences aren’t there to like you; although they do want to like you – and your act. They are there to experience something they have never experienced before. I am not talking about novelty, I’m talking about you! You have one chance to get the audience to appreciate the experience. Don’t blow it by being unprepared and not having done the prep work – not only the technical work but the mental work as well.

With each performance, audiences give us something very important; their time and attention. We need to recognize this and respect it.

Posted in Performance, Theory | Leave a comment

Character

Some are quick to discount a routine as ineffective if it doesn’t get a strong response in the first few attempts. The lack of a response is often not attributed to lack of practice or focused presentation, but a failing of the material. Rather than admit a failing on their part to develop an engaging presentation, the disenchanted enchanter jumps to other material in the elusive quest to “find the right trick.”

While there is some validity to the “right trick” premise, many people haven’t taken the time or effort to determine what type of character they have been “endowed” with. To look at it another way: to determine the performance approach that will be most effective for them in communicating the magic.

It can be difficult (and sometimes painful) to examine yourself, determine a definite performing character and spend time tailoring the magic to fit this character, but the wonderful thing about this approach is that, once determined, character virtually determines the material which material you can, and cannot, perform.

It can be very liberating to be limited in scope, n’est pas?

Posted in Performance, Theory | Leave a comment

Written in Stone

The longer you perform material, the more it becomes you, and the more you can focus on the details of performing and your relationship (and communication) with your audiences.

If you are a conscientious performer, over the lifetime of a performance piece, you will likely consciously work on improving it, but it will also gradually evolve on its own until it reaches a “finished” status, where the hard and fast dramatic elements (plot, script, movement, character, etc.) fuse with a sensitivity for “the moment” (context, time, locale, particular audience) to form a unique performance. This is usually only achieved after many, many performances.

It is this fluidity—this sensitivity to “the moment” coupled with a flexibility that comes with confidence of the material, that allows you to “loosen your grip” and ride the piece reacting to the vagaries of each performance situation. In this way, extended knowledge of the material, frees you up to grow as a performer.

While I think it is always good to be broadening your abilities as a performer (expanding your toolbox so to speak), there is much to be said for performing that material which reflects you the most. This is most likely the the material which you have performed the longest, that you are the most comfortable with and that will most likely get the strongest reactions.

Our audiences deserve our finest performances, therefore they deserve our most polished material.

Posted in Performance, Theory | Leave a comment

Spectators versus Participants

All too frequently magicians use audiences as furniture. Magic cannot happen without a participating audience member. Music can exist in the vacuum of a practice room or locked in a piece of plastic, art can hang in a closet, but magic needs an audience to experience it. As a theatre artist one task I did a lot was Lighting Design. Good lighting design reinforces the action without bringing too much attention to itself. The difficulty in lighting design is that you never light the walls or floor, but rather the actors that move through the space. Without the actors, you are essentially lighting the air. Lighting is only perceived when it interacts with a person or object. You most often see the effect of light rather than the light itself. The same can be true with magic. Every performance of magic is different, because the participants change not only with every performance, but with every piece and how they interact with the performer.

Posted in Theory | Leave a comment

The Distillery

When working on a new piece, I research and work through every version I can find. I play with the moves and handling for about six months, and then I will walk away from the research phase for a period of six months to a year. After this time, I will sit down and try to perform the piece without review and see what stuck and in what shape the routine is. I try to determine what is truly necessary in the piece to further audience conviction and engagement and what is mere fluff designed to impress.

I work to see what techniques have crept into my performances (as I will discover when I need to perform a false shuffle under fire and then all of a sudden realize that I am using a technique I learned for another effect). I then analyze how the techniques will affect audience conviction.

I am fascinated by the perpetual quest for the “easiest” trick. It occurs to me that technical requirements should only be considered for how strong a conviction level they create on the audience that everything is on the up-and-up…

Method should only be one factor that contributes to the total experience by the spectator… Yet we magicians are on an endless search for what is “easy” as opposed to what is appropriate… Only when the easiest method provides the highest level of conviction held by the spectator that what he perceives is what is, regardless of degree of the impossible…

There is a difference between easy method and easy effect (whatever that is)… If easy method is also transparent to audience because of simplicity, it does have an impact on audience experience (enjoyment, appreciation, whatever). What fools me is not an issue, the issue should be what methods are the right methods for me–and for my audience–when constructing or adapting a routine for performance…

I usually pick a magical plot because I see how I can make it work with my character. All of my pieces have an intriguing hook that must engage me first. If I (or more accurately—my character) are engaged, the audience must be swept along for the ride. Occasionally, I am intrigued by a plot, but don’t have a specific idea of how it might fit into my performances. Hopefully, during the time off, my subconscious is at work looking for the connections that can make the piece important to me. If not, when I sit down to revisit the plot, I begin the search for how to integrate the material in a logical way (for myself and my participants).

Posted in Theory | Leave a comment

Technically Technique

Believe it or not technique does not matter! That does not mean you can get away with having poor technique, rather that you should spend your time performing magic with the techniques that you are the most sure of, the most secure with. That does not mean that the study of new sleight-of-hand technique is without value. First, the more you practice, the more graceful you are whether with a new sleight you are just working on or when using techniques you have known cold for years. It makes no sense to perform a piece using techniques that you are uncomfortable using just because the originator found that technique to be the best for him. Time to alter the suit to fit you. Off the rack may be wonderful for most people, but when you are in the spotlight, you want to look your best. Use the techniques that make sense to you. Better that you use a double-undercut and have it fly under the radar because your body language reads, “non-issue,” rather than use a pass which makes you tense up at entirely the wrong moment.

Rehearse technical movements to break them in and fit your body. If they don’t fit, discard! That having been said, sometimes you have to weigh how the technique impacts the audience’s conviction-level. If simple technique leaves behind an image in their head of a weak moment, methodologically-speaking, perhaps you owe it yourself and your audiences to spend the time making a move your own.

Posted in Technique | Leave a comment